A Pace University survey of New Yorkers in 2004 found the New York Post to be the least-credible major news source in the city. As a tabloid-style paper, the Post has a reputation for sensationalized headlines, questionable journalistic practices, conservative bias, and influence from its ownership. Today, however, it remains the sixth most widely circulated newspaper in the country. So, how credible is the New York Post, and how biased is it?

What Is The Factual and How Does It Score Articles?
The Factual identifies the most informative and least opinionated articles from thousands of sources across the political spectrum. It does this by using a consistent and transparent rating algorithm to evaluate articles based on their sources, writing tone, author expertise, and publishing site, ultimately producing a grade between 0 and 100 for each article. The Factual uses this data to explore trends across the media ecosystem as well as to inform our daily newsletter. To learn more about how we score articles, visit our How It Works page.

How Factual Is the New York Post?

Over a dataset of 1,000 articles, the New York Post scored an average Factual Grade of 51.9%. This is below the average of 61.9% for all 240 news sources that we analyzed. This places the site in the 12th percentile of our dataset.

These low overall scores are partially due to low-quality sourcing, a lack of author expertise, and sensationalized writing and headlines. Most articles only have intermittent links to supporting evidence, and many of those links point back to other internal articles, suggesting limited diversity in sourcing. The Post’s tabloid style means some authors write on many different topics, leading to low overall scores for author expertise (rather than established beats). Additionally, part of the site’s approach to driving traffic involves the use of sensationalized headlines and text, both of which lead to lower article scores.

Like any news source, scores for articles from the New York Post vary widely because some articles are better sourced or less opinionated than others. For example, some scored 70% or above, while others scored below 50%.

Are you tired of vetting the news just to get the facts?
Get the best news in your inbox every morning. Determined by data, not politics.
Thank you!

Please check your email for instructions to ensure that the newsletter arrives in your inbox tomorrow.

Oops! Something went wrong.

How Opinionated Is the New York Post?

The Factual measures how opinionated an article is using natural language processing, producing a score we call the Writing Tone. For this metric, the algorithm looks for signs of subjective commentary (e.g., first person pronouns, unnecessary adverbs), as well as the emotional nature of selected words, and sees how prevalent they are for a given length of text. Text which is less opinionated gets higher ratings, with “0” being the most opinionated and “1” being the most neutral.

The New York Post had an average Writing Tone score of 0.59, placing it in the 46th percentile in our dataset. This suggests that articles from the site can be opinionated or neutral in tone, meaning some articles involve straightforward reporting while others are highly biased.

What Is the New York Post’s Political Bias?

The Factual classifies news sites by political bias as either Left, Moderate Left, Center, Moderate Right, or Right. This classification is derived from third-party assessments from media bias organizations such as All Sides and Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC). Based on this data, The Factual assigns the New York Post a Moderate Right bias. 

AllSides rates the New York Post as “Lean Right” based on an editorial review, community feedback, and blind bias surveys. The latest editorial review, in January 2021, found a mix of biased and unbiased reporting, as well as an overall approach to story selection that favors right-leaning perspectives, though not to an extreme degree. Overall, AllSides found the paper “to be biased toward clicks, not necessarily always left or right.”

MBFC rates the paper as having a “Right-Center” bias due to a tendency to publish articles that favor the right. They note that the paper has endorsed every Republican candidate for president since 1980, abstaining in 2016, but endorsing then-president Trump in 2020. MBFC gives the Post a “Mixed” score for factual reporting, based on several failed fact-checks.

Who Owns the New York Post?

The Post is owned by the family of Rupert Murdoch through the media group News Corp, which also owns Fox News, a number of UK tabloids, and numerous publications in Australia. Murdoch’s ownership has been repeatedly criticized for influencing the publication, including driving its shift toward sensationalism and imparting a conservative bias to its reporting. The paper is reportedly a favorite of former president Trump, and Trump and Murdoch are known to have a close relationship. However, the Post was by no means in lockstep with the former president. For example, it ran the frontpage headline “Stop the Insanity: You lost the election – here’s how to save your legacy” in December 2020.

Want to spend less time searching for the best news stories?
Get the best news in your inbox every morning. Determined by data, not politics.
Thank you!

Please check your email for instructions to ensure that the newsletter arrives in your inbox tomorrow.

Oops! Something went wrong.

Why Does It Matter?

News articles are bound to have bias because all authors use some frame of reference when they write a story. Political bias ratings are helpful in understanding this framing. However, it can be more beneficial to know how factual an article is based on quantifiable metrics that can be seen across the media ecosystem, from cited evidence, to author expertise, to the writing tone. This is what The Factual ascertains. 

Reading several, highly rated articles from across the political spectrum helps counter the bias of any news source or story. To have the day’s most factual news stories delivered to your inbox every morning, subscribe to our daily newsletter.

Published by Phillip Meylan

Phillip is a writer, researcher, and editor. At The Factual, he leads research efforts that utilize the company's ever growing data on the media ecosystem. He is also a contributor to FP Analytics, Foreign Policy's research and advisory division, and an adjunct fellow with the Center for Strategic and International Studies.